<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now the Debate Gets Interesting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sub2change.com/2007/11/21/now-the-debate-gets-interesting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sub2change.com/2007/11/21/now-the-debate-gets-interesting/</link>
	<description>I reserve the right to restate my opinion over and over until I agree with it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:50:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: the cell &#124; News 4U</title>
		<link>http://sub2change.com/2007/11/21/now-the-debate-gets-interesting/comment-page-1/#comment-21210</link>
		<dc:creator>the cell &#124; News 4U</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sub2change.com/?p=1442#comment-21210</guid>
		<description>[...] Now the Debate Gets Interesting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now the Debate Gets Interesting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://sub2change.com/2007/11/21/now-the-debate-gets-interesting/comment-page-1/#comment-18007</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sub2change.com/?p=1442#comment-18007</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to blog about it as well. Probably will get to it tomorrow. Some days just lend themselves more toward short posts.

Anyway, I think the reason the Right allowed the Left to define this issue is the same reason the Right has allowed the Left to define any issue. It&#039;s easier to play defense than to play offense. Unfortunately you can&#039;t score points on defense.

Take a look at the waterboarding as torture issue. How could anyone allow the Left to gain the moral high ground on the issue of dealing with jihadists? Because the Right either doesn&#039;t want to defend positions that are easily defendable or has no one to defend them other than talk radio and bloggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to blog about it as well. Probably will get to it tomorrow. Some days just lend themselves more toward short posts.</p>
<p>Anyway, I think the reason the Right allowed the Left to define this issue is the same reason the Right has allowed the Left to define any issue. It&#8217;s easier to play defense than to play offense. Unfortunately you can&#8217;t score points on defense.</p>
<p>Take a look at the waterboarding as torture issue. How could anyone allow the Left to gain the moral high ground on the issue of dealing with jihadists? Because the Right either doesn&#8217;t want to defend positions that are easily defendable or has no one to defend them other than talk radio and bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

